Jiri Lehecka vs Zachary Svajda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Lehecka has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.21% of points compared to Svajda's 46.35%. Could this minor advantage play a crucial role in tight moments? It might.
• When it comes to returning, Svajda outperforms Lehecka, winning 44.75% of opponent's second serve points versus Lehecka's 43.02%. However, the first serve return stats favor Svajda as well, with 23.85% over Lehecka's 22.8%.
• Under pressure, Lehecka demonstrates a narrow advantage in saving breakpoints, saving 53.81% compared to Svajda's 52.59%. This could be critical during high-tension games.
• Lehecka holds a superior match win percentage over the past year at 61.29%, while Svajda has won 54.69% of his matches, indicating Lehecka's consistency at a higher competitive level.
• Surveying match surfaces, Lehecka performs best on Clay with a 63% win rate, whereas Svajda excels on Grass with a 68% win rate. Interestingly, both have their weakest performance on Indoor Hard courts.
• Lehecka predominantly competes on the Main tour, boasting a 71.43% win rate. In contrast, Svajda plays more in Challenger and ITF tournaments (> $10K), with a 55.88% win rate.
• Analyzing the quality of opponents faced, Lehecka has competed against players averaging a rank of 55.74, whereas Svajda's opponents hold an average rank of 233.45. Is Lehecka's experience against tougher competition an advantage? Likely, yes.
• In deciding sets over the last year, Svajda edges slightly with a 50% win rate compared to Lehecka's 47%. In close games, Svajda might be more resilient.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Svajda leads by converting 36.18% of opportunities, while Lehecka converts 31.53%. In critical moments, Svajda may capitalize more effectively.

Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming match, Lehecka demonstrates a minor advantage in second-serve performance, which could be pivotal during crucial moments. Despite this, Svajda shows stronger return capabilities, a potential asset in facing Lehecka's serves.

Lehecka's experience on the Main tour and familiarity with top-ranked opponents add to his profile as the likely favorite. Furthermore, his overall consistency this past year suggests an ability to maintain steadiness throughout the match.

However, Svajda's superior performance under pressure in deciding sets and his breakpoint conversion edge cannot be ignored. These factors imply that Svajda will be competitive, particularly in key moments of the match.

While both players exhibit strengths and reliable stats, Lehecka appears more likely to clinch victory, given his record against higher-ranked opponents and sustained performance on main tour events.